<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Building healthy Employment Relationshsips in BC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca</link>
	<description>Your Employment Relationship Specialist in BC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media Policies by Social Media Policies &#124; Building healthy Employment Relationshsips in BC &#171; My Social Media Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2012/01/11/social-media-policies/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Policies &#124; Building healthy Employment Relationshsips in BC &#171; My Social Media Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workplace-investigations.ca/?p=876#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] the Work Placehrscoops from the blog:: Social Media Policies http://t.co/ITKwAoiB #HRscoops&#8230;Via www.simplycommunicating.ca Share this:Like this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Work Placehrscoops from the blog:: Social Media Policies <a href="http://t.co/ITKwAoiB" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/ITKwAoiB</a> #HRscoops&#8230;Via <a href="http://www.simplycommunicating.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.simplycommunicating.ca</a> Share this:Like this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When should you do a Workplace-Investigation? by Workplace Investigations: When? Who? What? But, most of all: How? &#171; One Mediation</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2011/12/29/when-should-you-do-a-workplace-investigation/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Workplace Investigations: When? Who? What? But, most of all: How? &#171; One Mediation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=513#comment-128</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are we losing communication skills? by Kellie Auld</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2011/01/05/are-we-losing-communication-skills/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie Auld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=313#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Hi Dennis
Thanks so much for your contribution to the blog.  I agree with you that social media is extremely valuable and I myself have lots of contacts through Linked In, Facebook, Skype, etc.  I prefer face to face where possible but definitely enjoy the benefits social media has to offer and completely understand why in some cases, it is almost better than face to face because people live in different places and have pretty hectic lives at times.  It’s easy enough to send a note along or meet on Skype when schedules are quite tight or when geography prevents face to face.  Your points are very well-taken.
Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dennis<br />
Thanks so much for your contribution to the blog.  I agree with you that social media is extremely valuable and I myself have lots of contacts through Linked In, Facebook, Skype, etc.  I prefer face to face where possible but definitely enjoy the benefits social media has to offer and completely understand why in some cases, it is almost better than face to face because people live in different places and have pretty hectic lives at times.  It’s easy enough to send a note along or meet on Skype when schedules are quite tight or when geography prevents face to face.  Your points are very well-taken.<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are we losing communication skills? by Dennis Thome</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2011/01/05/are-we-losing-communication-skills/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Thome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=313#comment-122</guid>
		<description>While I agree face to face communication is better than social media communication, there are important aspects of social media communication tools that cannot be overlooked.
On a family level where family is spread throughout North America and the world social media plays an important role. so to with business relationships that are seperated by vast distances.
Perhaps the most significant difference is the rural/ urban seperation. People in urban areas have more venues/opportunities to communicate face to face. this is not true in rural areas where there are not the same opportunities available.
Lastly social media like Facebook, Twitter , etc brings togethe people who do to see each other often and those that have not touched bases since college, a job change or relationship breakdown. 
social media is a tool that offers possibilities the telphone never thought of and basically it is a lot cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree face to face communication is better than social media communication, there are important aspects of social media communication tools that cannot be overlooked.<br />
On a family level where family is spread throughout North America and the world social media plays an important role. so to with business relationships that are seperated by vast distances.<br />
Perhaps the most significant difference is the rural/ urban seperation. People in urban areas have more venues/opportunities to communicate face to face. this is not true in rural areas where there are not the same opportunities available.<br />
Lastly social media like Facebook, Twitter , etc brings togethe people who do to see each other often and those that have not touched bases since college, a job change or relationship breakdown.<br />
social media is a tool that offers possibilities the telphone never thought of and basically it is a lot cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cost of Employee Turnover by Slim Fairview</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2010/02/04/the-cost-of-employee-turnover/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Slim Fairview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrscoops.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Cost of Turnover is one thing, Cause of Turnover is another.

Sometimes it is simply a poor hire. [Hiring Manager]

Poor Management. [Some people should not be bosses.]

Poor Budgeting. [Sure, he took the job. But did you expect him to stay for that salary?]

Personnel Issues.  [How many complaints have you received about the employee you refuse to deal with?]

Sincerest regards,

Slim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost of Turnover is one thing, Cause of Turnover is another.</p>
<p>Sometimes it is simply a poor hire. [Hiring Manager]</p>
<p>Poor Management. [Some people should not be bosses.]</p>
<p>Poor Budgeting. [Sure, he took the job. But did you expect him to stay for that salary?]</p>
<p>Personnel Issues.  [How many complaints have you received about the employee you refuse to deal with?]</p>
<p>Sincerest regards,</p>
<p>Slim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Places to Work &#8211; Really? by Kellie Auld</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2011/08/05/best-places-to-work-really/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie Auld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=375#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response Jennifer - and yes - the folks who put in the information are the companies themselves.  If you review the &quot;Best Places to Work&quot; sites, you will see how they work.  In some instances; employees are surveyed but it&#039;s not usually to take part in these reports.  Kind of disappointing, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response Jennifer &#8211; and yes &#8211; the folks who put in the information are the companies themselves.  If you review the &#8220;Best Places to Work&#8221; sites, you will see how they work.  In some instances; employees are surveyed but it&#8217;s not usually to take part in these reports.  Kind of disappointing, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Places to Work &#8211; Really? by Tippi</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2011/08/05/best-places-to-work-really/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tippi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=375#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hi Kellie,

I too had the opportunity to work for a &quot;great&quot; employer.  What is hidden behind the public eye was another story.  It is all about the outward image. 

I have often wondered how the best employer rating book came to be and just who decided it. Thanks for shedding some light on how the numbers add up and giving me a better perspective.  

My question is who ultimately has control over what is being asked?  I was actually told to lie on my best place to work survey and keep tight lipped about the problems!

I believe that reason there are glitz and glam perks is to compensate for the total lack of management , appropriate succession planning and the fear of losing the best employer title.  By glossing over the problems the  company actually becomes the worst place to work with the best perks!  Razzle Dazzle &#039;em and no one will be the wiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kellie,</p>
<p>I too had the opportunity to work for a &#8220;great&#8221; employer.  What is hidden behind the public eye was another story.  It is all about the outward image. </p>
<p>I have often wondered how the best employer rating book came to be and just who decided it. Thanks for shedding some light on how the numbers add up and giving me a better perspective.  </p>
<p>My question is who ultimately has control over what is being asked?  I was actually told to lie on my best place to work survey and keep tight lipped about the problems!</p>
<p>I believe that reason there are glitz and glam perks is to compensate for the total lack of management , appropriate succession planning and the fear of losing the best employer title.  By glossing over the problems the  company actually becomes the worst place to work with the best perks!  Razzle Dazzle &#8216;em and no one will be the wiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 and Beyond by John Prpich</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2011/01/02/2011-and-beyond/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>John Prpich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=309#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Kellie, thank you for your article, its interesting to me, but perhaps for reasons that will be different from your other readers.  As I read your article it reminded me of any and every movie I&#039;ve seen more than once, the ending never seems to change.

What we are going to see is what we&#039;ve always experienced in every other recession, you can count on it, it&#039;s never changed.  I hate to be a pessimist, but it appears that we&#039;ve learned nothing from the last several recessions, we continue to take the same approach over and over again.  Employers talk about being concerned that they will lose talent, but their behaviors tell a different story.  
If I was a betting person, I&#039;d guess that very few employers will change their approach.  You touch on a very important aspect of business, one that&#039;s never changed, systems and process management.  With all the excellent systems and processes available to organizations, they still tend to use the less effective approach, this is evident when you analyze the recruitment and selection processes that are currently being used, inefficient and incomplete.
You touched on recognition, another topic that&#039;s been around for a long, long time, yet, how many have come to terms with the importance of developing reward and recognition cultures, only those that have come to understand the value.
Daniel Pink said it best, &quot;Managers don&#039;t practice what science knows&quot;, if we continue to ignore the facts and truths, we will be destined to fail, history has proven this over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kellie, thank you for your article, its interesting to me, but perhaps for reasons that will be different from your other readers.  As I read your article it reminded me of any and every movie I&#8217;ve seen more than once, the ending never seems to change.</p>
<p>What we are going to see is what we&#8217;ve always experienced in every other recession, you can count on it, it&#8217;s never changed.  I hate to be a pessimist, but it appears that we&#8217;ve learned nothing from the last several recessions, we continue to take the same approach over and over again.  Employers talk about being concerned that they will lose talent, but their behaviors tell a different story.<br />
If I was a betting person, I&#8217;d guess that very few employers will change their approach.  You touch on a very important aspect of business, one that&#8217;s never changed, systems and process management.  With all the excellent systems and processes available to organizations, they still tend to use the less effective approach, this is evident when you analyze the recruitment and selection processes that are currently being used, inefficient and incomplete.<br />
You touched on recognition, another topic that&#8217;s been around for a long, long time, yet, how many have come to terms with the importance of developing reward and recognition cultures, only those that have come to understand the value.<br />
Daniel Pink said it best, &#8220;Managers don&#8217;t practice what science knows&#8221;, if we continue to ignore the facts and truths, we will be destined to fail, history has proven this over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Employee Engagement by Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2010/11/21/employee-engagement-2/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=297#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Great blog it&#039;s not often that I comment but I felt you deserve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog it&#8217;s not often that I comment but I felt you deserve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Tips to make your Orientations Successful! by Leland Kama</title>
		<link>http://www.simplycommunicating.ca/index.php/2010/08/16/5-tips-to-make-your-orientations-successful/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Leland Kama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.simplycommunicating.ca/?p=237#comment-116</guid>
		<description>very good article. thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good article. thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

